khaos

"vast chasm, void"
Ask me anything

Personality is much more than autobiographical detail, it’s our way of processing the world, our way of being, and it cannot be artificially removed from our activities; it is our way of being active. Eliot may have been ruthlessly impersonal in his writing in the superficial sense (if by that we mean he did not reveal personal details, such as the tricky fact that he had committed his wife to an asylum), but never was a man’s work more inflected with his character, with his beliefs about the nature of the world. As for that element of his work that he puts forward as a model of his impersonality - a devotion to tradition - such devotion is the very definition of personality in writing. The choices a writer makes within a tradition - preferring Milton to Moliere, caring for Barth over Barthelme - constitute some of the most personal information we can have about him.

Zadie Smith, in her essay, “Fail better(She’s responding to T.S. Eliot’s essay, “Tradition and the Individual Talent”)

  1. rakel reblogged this from dianawueger
  2. dianawueger reblogged this from austinkleon
  3. iamwatyouarenot reblogged this from defterisk
  4. thesisprojectarchive reblogged this from austinkleon
  5. thealphagirl reblogged this from tobia
  6. naijacentric reblogged this from tobia
  7. anngelita reblogged this from defterisk
  8. defterisk reblogged this from tobia
  9. julinkah reblogged this from tobia
  10. jamiemacdonalds reblogged this from tobia
  11. twatswat reblogged this from tobia
  12. tobia reblogged this from austinkleon and added:
    better.” (In response
  13. cakespeare reblogged this from austinkleon
  14. burstofhope reblogged this from sylvia-scarlett
  15. inkythinking reblogged this from austinkleon
  16. cuttingword reblogged this from austinkleon
  17. allnaturaloriginal reblogged this from austinkleon
More Information